my claim is simple: I cannot be governed without consent. If you do not agree with that than your position must be “It is lawful to govern another without their consent”. Do you see the immense chaos that must develop from your position?
The rule of law states we are all equal and as such we have the power to say no.
Additionally, are you claiming the right to govern me either directly or by way of an agent without my consent?
Know what the law calls someone who when seeking sex won’t take NO for an answer? A rapist. So what should we call those people in government who claim consent as justification for their actions and yet won’t allow us to say NO? Are they any less a rapist?
No comments:
Post a Comment