mutual consent

"Who are you to decide? Who are you to think someone should? How about we simply agree right off the bat that since we are all equal no one can govern another without mutual consent? That is the definition of a society after all. Additionally, you used the word society, what is wrong with mutual consent? And what is wrong with thinking that without my consent neither you, nor your representative or their agents can impose your or their will upon me, ok? And then all we have to do is recognize that the courts and the legislature is nothing more than a vehicle for you to impose your will and that the law says there are limits upon whom you can impose them. And that those who do not consent, you cant impose upon them, either directly or through your legislature or courts. Simple for those who do not thirst for power or are blinded by fear"